Significance included
The t-test on r tells you whether a correlation this strong could easily have come from unrelated data.
Tools / Correlation Calculator
Paste your paired values, one x and y per line, and get Pearson's correlation coefficient with r squared and a significance test.
r = Σ(x − x̄)(y − ȳ) ÷ √( Σ(x − x̄)² × Σ(y − ȳ)² )
Paste paired values to see the result
One pair per line, x first then y, separated by a space, comma, or tab. Two spreadsheet columns paste in cleanly.
Every line must have exactly two numbers. A row with one missing, or a third column carried over from a spreadsheet, is rejected rather than silently trimmed.
r is the strength and direction, r² is the share of variance explained, and p says whether it is distinguishable from zero.
An r on its own can mislead. Ten points can produce r = 0.6 by luck, so the p-value belongs right next to it.
The t-test on r tells you whether a correlation this strong could easily have come from unrelated data.
r = 0.5 sounds moderate until you see it explains only 25% of the variance.
Two columns copied out of a sheet arrive tab separated, which this parses directly.
Does satisfaction move with response time, or with number of contacts?
Check whether spend and signups track each other across weeks.
Standard Pearson r with the significance test in one step.
r = Σ(x − x̄)(y − ȳ) ÷ √( Σ(x − x̄)² × Σ(y − ȳ)² )
r runs from −1 to 1. The significance test uses t = r√(n − 2) ÷ √(1 − r²) with n − 2 degrees of freedom.
0.0 to 0.1
Negligible
0.1 to 0.3
Weak
0.3 to 0.5
Moderate
0.5 to 1.0
Strong
Pearson's r is the covariance of x and y divided by the product of their standard deviations:
r = Σ(x − x̄)(y − ȳ) ÷ √( Σ(x − x̄)² × Σ(y − ȳ)² )
The result runs from −1 (perfect inverse) through 0 (no linear relationship) to 1 (perfect positive).
As a common rough guide, absolute r below 0.3 is weak, 0.3 to 0.5 is moderate, and above 0.5 is strong.
Those bands are conventions, not rules. In physics 0.9 might be disappointing; in social research 0.4 can be a strong finding.
The share of variance in one variable that is explained by a linear relationship with the other. An r of 0.6 gives r² = 0.36, so 36% of the variation is accounted for and 64% is not.
It is a useful antidote to over-reading a moderate r.
No. A correlation is consistent with x causing y, y causing x, both being driven by something else, or coincidence.
Only a controlled experiment or a careful causal design can settle direction.
Three, because the significance test needs at least one degree of freedom: two points always sit on a line, so r is 1 either way and says nothing about a relationship. Any conclusion from fewer than about 20 pairs is fragile, and the p-value here accounts for sample size directly, so a strong r on few points still shows a weak p-value.
Pearson r will understate a real relationship that curves. Plot the points first. For monotonic but non-linear data, a rank correlation such as Spearman's is more appropriate.
Not with Pearson's r. Use the chi square calculator for two categorical variables and read Cramer's V as the strength of association.
No. Parsing and calculation happen in your browser.
Collecting fresh survey responses? Try Formms for a form with a short link and QR.
Formms builds the survey from a prompt, then you can paste counts back into these calculators anytime.
View a demo form →